No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. 8. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. Has this experiment been replicated or verified? is released on Friday. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. By continuing to browse the site bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. 3. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? That's not always true, but it's often true. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. IE 11 is not supported. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. to someone you know: The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: asks nothing but . and published a study guide. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. Real news, real hope. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. That's what makes the world so interesting. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. improve functionality and performance. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! The brain wasn't born yesterday. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." D (k)ow!? What was new? up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. Is the movie What The Bleep Do We Know? factual or mumbo jumbo - Quora Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. Thorough debunking of that shlock "What The Bleep Do We Know?" - Yelp When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). Puppymonkeybaby proves Rubio talking point Obama is destroying subscription. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . What the Bleep Do We Know!? - WatchDocumentaries.com In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. Free delivery for many products. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com is god-awful. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. PDF Hidden Messages In Water It's certainly not. What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? "Bleep" of faith | Salon.com A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. This website uses cookies to You can't change the world by thinking about it. 2. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. What the Bleep Do We Know? | Not Even Wrong - Columbia University [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. Consciousness must be involved. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? It is just a movie. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. It was one of the most important moments in history. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. They want suggestions, not formulas. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. We don't know which way it's going to go. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. Blech. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. It's certainly not. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. What the #$*! He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. The minds boggle | Science | The Guardian "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2004 What the #$*! Do We Know? movie review (2004) | Roger Ebert But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. Beyond fear, beyond anger. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. Featuring two (!) How quantum physicists 'review' the 'Bleep' movie I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. You are free to comment as you wish. Your subscription to One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. What the Bleep Do We Know? DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR - eBay A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). !" is a radical departure from convention. What The Bleep Do We Know The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless - Amazon "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. They don't go anywhere, Fred. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. (eBook/PDF) Curious Obsessions In The History Of Science And "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. Review of the What the Bleep Do We Know? - Christian Research Institute VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. BBC - Movies - review - What The Bleep Do We Know!? DVD And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. What The Bleep Do We Know? - Home - Facebook 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. He claims the drop was achieved. Do We (K)now!? Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? FILM IN REVIEW; 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews.